Skip to content

FDA 2024 Animal Drug User Fee Educational Conference – Part 2



    Lesson Content:

    Communication Pathways with CVM

    Annie Roa
    Project Manager
    Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation
    Center for Veterinary Medicine, FDA

    Best Practices in the Approval Process

    Ana Lazo
    Quality Assurance Specialist
    Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation
    Center for Veterinary Medicine, FDA

    Delisa Davis
    Quality Assurance Specialist
    Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation
    Center for Veterinary Medicine, FDA

    Q&A on the General Approval Process

    Walt Ellenberg & CVM Panel

    Abstract

    This webinar provides an essential guide to communication pathways and best practices for submitting high-quality information to the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) for new animal drug approvals. It outlines initial contact points for new sponsors, including Ask CVM and the project management mailbox, and details the registration process for electronic submission systems like FDA ESG and CVM ESS, emphasizing the use of the eSubmitter tool. The presentation covers formal and informal communication methods, highlighting the significance of the Investigational New Animal Drug (INAD) file as the central record for formal communications throughout the phased review process. Key formal interactions discussed include various meeting types like Presubmission Conferences, where binding agreements on development plans are reached, Method Demonstration meetings, and other ONAD meetings for specific topics. Newer processes like the early response letter for virtual presubmission conferences and the informal written response process (C-submission) for less complex queries are also introduced. A critical focus is placed on the importance of submission quality, stressing clear organization, consistent documentation, adherence to good documentation practices (GDPs), and the submission of credible raw data adhering to ALCOA principles (attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate). Common submission and study quality gaps observed by CVM are discussed, along with the vital role of Quality Assurance Study Reviewers (Quazars) in ensuring data integrity. Early and continuous communication with CVM project managers is highly encouraged to streamline the approval process and foster shared expectations.

    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *